Skip to main content

Les gestes qui comptent

Some of my blog posts are sparked off my a Twitter reference or chat with other teachers. This is one such post. File it under practical classroom tips.

How do you use your body to help pupils with understanding?

When dictating you can use arms and even your leg for humorous effect to help pupils with written accuracy. Acute, circumflex and grave in French can be done holding your arms at the right angle above your head. Two forward fingers for umlauts or trémas. You can even cock your leg to indicate a c cedilla (ç). (Pupils can also use their own arms to show accents if you give them words.)

Arms are useful for indicating subject pronouns during practice drills. Point to yourself for first person singular, point to left or right for third person singular, point forward with one arm for second singular and two hands for second plural. Use two hands pointing to yourself for first person plural.

Various verbs are easy to demonstrated by use of limbs and body: to dance, to sing, to ride a horse, eat, drink, talk, carry, wear, love, wave, shake, to play tennis/ping-pong/rugby/football/cricket/hockey, to cry, to kick, to pass etc.

Use gesture to indicate illnesses, aches and pains.

Use gesture to indicate height, length, width and weight.

Use pointing gestures to play Simon Says.

Gestures to indicate common nouns: cup, spoon, knife, spade, glass, flower, tree, washing machine, cat (stroking gesture).

Gestures to air spell out letters or words to a class.

Pupils enjoy gesture too and there are plenty of miming style tasks pupils can do in pairs. "Dumb customer" was a favourite of mine. A mute customer has to mime a list of items they wish to buy in the shop while the partner tries to guess them.

Be careful if you use gestures to indicate animals. In a Spanish butcher's, not knowing the word for beef, I indicated horns on my head with fingers and made a bull-like noise. When we put the meat on the barbecue it tuned out to be goat.

Is gesture an aid to acquisition? Surely it must be. It's something we do instinctively for both first and second language acquisition. If you are like me it even becomes an example of what the French call "déformation professionnelle". Namely, you go round speaking to other people using totally unnecessary gestures just because you are, or were, a language teacher!

By the way, there is plenty of research (as well as common sense) to support the idea that pupils and teachers doing gestures can aid learning. Examples:

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00371032/document (young children learning vocabulary)

http://www.biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/viewFile/248/269 (summary of neuroscientific studies)

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/289162.php

http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/teachers-gestures-boost-math-learning/ (young learners of maths)

http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/274606 (young learners acquiring L2 vocabulary)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g