Skip to main content

Review: This is Language





https://www.thisislanguage.com

It's been a while since I've had a good look at This is Language which was established in 2011 and seems to be going strong. They have been kind enough to supply me with a temporary logon to review the site. There are three languages available, French, German and Spanish. I'm looking at the French resources here.

The site is best known for its authentic video interview content which is primarily aimed at KS3 and GCSE students. Categories to choose from are Friends and Family, Free Time and Leisure, Education and Work, My Area, Home and Health, Holidays and Travel, Prompt cards and Compilations. In the friends and family there are over 50 short video clips tagged "My friends" ranging length from 15 seconds to two minutes. (Most are under one minute long.) The whole archive is enormous. A star rating system ranks clips from Easy to Hard.

The hardest clips are well within the range of good GCSE pupils while the easiest are more limited in vocabulary range and could be used at KS3 (near novice level). Sound quality is excellent and interviewees are all young.

Each clip is accompanied by interactive tasks such as drag and drop gap-fill, individual words read aloud to repeat, timed gap-fill requiring spelling out of words and multi-choice comprehension. There is a transcription and printed worksheet which can be printed off. There is also a facility to set video tasks for students to do for homework for example.

The Vocab section allows teachers to set blocks of categorised words to learn. Some may like this, though it doesn't appeal to me greatly. The new Grammar section also allows teachers to set exercises including cloze, write-out gap-fill and jumbled sentences. (A useful introductory video explains how it works by the way.)

If you choose a particular item of grammar you are led to a video introduction in English which explains the rule, then you move on to to the timed training exercises. Written notes provide further guidance. The exercises themselves are clear and navigation is simple. I would say that this section could be used in class, but would be better for self-study or revision.

In the Resources section a small set of "hypersheets" consists of colourful pdf worksheets. Both this section and the Grammar section are works in progress. I should also mention that there is a page ("Nutty Tilez") which allows students to play online against others students and to take part in leader boards.

Overall, This is Language is a very good resource indeed. The killer content is the video material which can be used in many ways, either for teacher-led multi-skill practice or for self-study. It was just the type of video listening material I was keen to see and which was so hard to find. The Testimonials page has a couple of case study videos.

The fly in the ointment is the price. A yearly subscription costs £300 for one language, £480 for two and £540 for three. If you want individual student logons these cost an extra £2.40 per student. This is Language tell me prices are inclusive of VAT, which a lot of schools can claim back. So before VAT prices are £250 for 1 language, £400 for 2, £450 for 3 and £2 per student. So this is not a cheap resource and will be beyond the reach of many departments. That said, compared with the well-known Kerboodle, the content is in my view far superior. Going abroad to record authentic material and put it on a professional platform does not come cheap, which is why so much publisher material is disappointing. You can get a 14 day free trial to see what you think. The team who run the site are friendly and keen to help.

As a practising teacher I would have done my best to subscribe to This is Language. The video content alone makes it worthwhile and it looks like they are adding to the site all the time. Good luck to them!






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,