Skip to main content

Lack of time

"The bleak picture was compounded by the publication last month of an OECD survey that showed that secondary school pupils in the UK spend less time studying languages than their counterparts anywhere else in the developed world. Only 7 per cent of the lesson time of 12 to 14 year-olds is allocated to languages, which is half the amount that they spend on sciences. This puts England joint bottom of a table of 39 countries, alongside Ireland and Estonia and behind Indonesia and Mexico."
Baroness Coussins (speaking in the House of Lords)
(Did she mean England or the UK?)

The new English Bacc will definitely give a boost to modern languages. This Wednesday the government will produce its first league table based on numbers of pupils achieving a good pass in maths, English, a science, a humanity and a modern language. It's pretty unfair, actually, producing such a "retrospective" league table (the English bacc was only made public last September so schools are being judged on criteria they had no idea about just weeks ago). Using league tables to get schools to alter their curriculum seems an odd way of going about things and I worry that schools in disadvantaged areas will look poorer because their pupils may not be best suited for learning traditional subjects. Does anyone else see the irony of a secretary of state for education claiming he wants heads and teachers to run the show, then setting up a league table system which strongly urges them in the direction of traditionalism? So much for localism. This is a classic example of top-downism.

That said, Baroness Coussins's reminder about curriculum time allocated to languages is important. It comes down to this: school leaders generally value languages a good way below maths, science and English. I could present a case (as did Simon Jenkins recently in The Guardian) about how we hugely overrate the importance of maths and science, as we used to with Latin, but at least they could allocate a reasonable amount of time to allow average pupils a chance of making serious progress. The common format of one hour lessons does nothing to help, since it reduces the number of contacts per week, but pupils, even bright ones, cannot make enough progress on one or two time slots per week.

At my school we offer four or five slots of 40 minutes a week for French. This is one reason, in my view, why our pupils do well. Little and often....

Thanks to Clare Seccombe for reminding us of Baroness Coussins's remarks.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/25/michael-gove-humanities-curriculum-reform?INTCMP=SRCH">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/25/michael-gove-humanities-curriculum-reform?INTCMP=SRCH

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,