Skip to main content

Strip bingo

If you know this language game already, look away now... unless you you want to see the little twist that makes it even better.

To play strip bingo well, you have to make sure you introduce it by name to the class. Interest will be immediately aroused.

You then hand out a long strip of paper (A4 cut into three long strips is fine) and tell your students to write down, say, 12 words relating to a vocabulary theme you have been working on. Make sure you tell them to spread out the words and use the whole space! Then give them the instructions (I would do this in English to save time and confusion.) You then say out loud words on this theme and if a student has the word at either end of their strip of paper, they may tear it off. Remember that you will have to repeat the same words over and over. To make the game last you can avoid saying an obvious word which most students would have on their list. The process continues until one student has no words left.

The game goes quite quickly, but it is easy to adapt it to your time slot by changing the number of words they write down.

Now, here's a little improvement which achieves the same outcome for vocab consolidation, but which adds a greater level of listening input. All you need to do is, instead of just reading a single word, you make up on the spot a sentence or very short paragraph into which you insert a word from the topic area. So, let's say you are working on clothes, you might say:

Je vais en ville souvent avec mes parents. Le weekend dernier je suis allé à mon magasin favori où j'ai acheté un nouveau jean noir. Il est très beau et pas très cher.

You could even throw in more than one word for variation, as long as you tell the class you might do this.


To me this seems like a better use of the strip bingo concept. It is harder, puts vocab in context and builds up listening skill. I think your students would listen very hard during this game, don't you?

An alternative variation would be to get students to write a quantity next to their vocab items. They can only remove a strip if the quantity is right.

Strip bingo works well with near beginners up to intermediate level, although with this twist you could even just about make it work at advanced level. Hardly any preparation needed and it can be used as a starter, filler or "plenary". Make sure you have a bin and that they don't cheat!

Comments

  1. Great twist, kicking myself that I hadn't thought of it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great idea, Steve. Thanks.
      I've started to play strip bingo a lot with my lower ability students. Although, because they are very excitable and I'm such a coward, I've renamed it "rip bingo".

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the comments.

      Yes, it does get them excited, Dom. Rip Bingo LOL (not the DC one).

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics