Skip to main content

Becoming an outstanding language teacher

I've been working on a book which will be published by Routledge in the first half of next year (all being well). It's provisionally titled "Becoming an Outstanding Languages Teacher". The book is aimed at trainee and experienced teachers around the world who aspire to the magic "outstanding" epithet, that piece of English inspection-speak (which I never liked). It's hard to define precisely what excellence means in teaching, of course, yet we have a pretty good idea who the excellent teachers in our schools are. The book tries to unpick aspects if what "outstanding" might look like. What do you have to do for pupils to hold you in the highest regard?

The book is pretty much written and will be around 200 pages long. Its "unique selling point" will be the level of detail in which it analyses individual lessons. There are four chapters which analyse in detail lessons and lesson sequences centred on speaking, reading texts, visuals and writing. I've written line-by-line descriptions with commentary suggesting how you'd interact with the class at each point. I believe this will be particularly useful for teachers new to the craft. Aspects of the latest GCSE and A-level syllabuses will also be looked at.

As with The Language Teacher Toolkit, the underlying methodology is pragmatic and, in this instance,  largely based on my own experience. But to demonstrate that I don't believe in any one "method" I've included some description and brief analysis of some unorthodox approaches which break the usual communicative mould. I'm hoping these case studies will challenge some conventional wisdom.

Even so, all the descriptions do assume the type of general methodological principles we outlined in the Toolkit book - target language use, recycling, structured practice and so on. These are rooted in a sort of half-way house between skill-acquisition and comprehension theory.

But unlike the Toolkit this book makes scant reference to research, even though the latter would support my recommendations. The emphasis once again is on practical techniques and ideas for the classroom based on experience, observation, reading and common sense. Teachers will find plenty of ideas to add to their repertoire. I've done my best not to repeat material used in the Toolkit, although it's hard to avoid a degree of overlap.

There is always a bit of a conundrum with this type of handbook. On the one hand you don't want to come across as preaching and prescriptive, on the other you do need to give your clearest advice. So I've done my best to achieve a balance in that regard. Readers will decide if I've succeeded.

The 14 draft chapters have titles like Running a room, Enjoying sounds, Getting grammatical, Words and chunks, Good games, Dissecting a lesson:texts, Pace, challenge and questions, and Teaching all students. The tone of the book is a bit less formal than the one we employed in the Toolkit, so it's a lighter read, but again it's a book you could either read from cover to cover or dip in and out of.

I'll let you know more when I'm nearer publication.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,